October 5th 2012
True to type
Something that turned up because of the new Rowling book, actually, and made me think about things.
Rowling wrote a series of books (ostensibly) for children – books that started squarely in Middle Grade territory and segued into Young Adult, if you want to apply the labels strictly. And let me correct that, just a little – they weren’t BOOKS. They were a publishing phenomenon, the likes of which doesn’t often happen twice in a lifetime.
But the series ended, as series do. And Rowling, the writer, was now done with them.
Financially speaking she was set for life – she didn’t NEED to write another word, ever, ever, ever, ever, and she still probably couldn’t spend all the Pottermoney in a single lifetime. But she decided that she wanted to keep writing – which was fine, which was well and good.
And now the new Rowling book, “The Casual Vacancy”, is out. And the first wave of reviews – both professional and casual readership – are in. And GUESS what most of them come round to, in the end?
“The book is nothing like Harry Potter.”
One might have expected that, really. But looking at it sideways it strikes me as wholly unfair, for a whole slew of different reasons. The first and foremost of which is, is a writer REALLY doomed to regurtitate the same thing over and over again if said thing has been a huge (read: money making) success for that writer’s publishers? Is success a laurel crown or a straitjacket?
Here’s a disclaimer, right off the bat. I read the first three books of the Potter series in book form (I know the whole story, and the background behhind the story, from the movies and from what I have heard and read when people have talked or written about it) – and I have neither the interest nor the intention of reading “Vacancy” – I am writing an opinion piece on what I know of ROwling’s style and on what I have heard others contribute towards an illumination of it. And what I have to go on is this.
The Harry Potter stories were distinguished by their sheer exuberant inventiveness – wands, dog-latin spells, potions, Diagon Alley, that fabulous dining hall at Hogwarts which exists in no boarding school ever, the Sorting Hat, nargles, etc etc etc etc etc. But the background to it all – and the substrate on which this was built – was not original at all – it was all predicated on a subgenre as hoary as the hills in winter, the British BOarding School Story. There have been dozens of these. The basic tree, as it were, existed long before Rowling stepped up with her box of tricks and began to decorate everything for Christmas. And my point is that she was very good indeed at those decorations – they were vivid, they were sparkly, they drew the eye and the heart and the imagination – but *she already had the tree*. She didn’t need to build that. The substrate was there for her to work on. And so long as she could juggle the baubles and the tinsel, the lights and the magic, she was doing just fine – but if you paid attention to her actual writing style, that was serviceable but not wondrous. Which might have been perfectly fine for books like Harry Potter, with the opportunity to camouflage any shortcomings in writing style with all the overlaid wonderfulness of sheer world-creating pizzazz. But even in Harry Potter’s world, things were beginning to go a little sideways at the end.
I am thinking particularly of that ill-advised epilogue which Rowling added to the end of Potter #7, the grown-up protags of the series now at Hogwarts Platform sending their own sprogs off to thefabled school. And the magic, here…. well…. it is beginning to flake off. Why? Because this epilogue loses several essential things that made Potterworld so compelling, and gains a few other things which make you suddenly question the whole edifice of that world. Let us list:
1. The Muggle/Wizarding world interface is fraying badly. In a number of ways. Let me put it this way – if your education consists of Hogwarts – with courses in Potions and Defense against Dark Arts and all sorts of wonderful stuff like that but not (as far as I could ever tell) English Lit or Calculus – your job porspects as a Hogwarts graduate are somewhat limited in the “real” world (you try applying for a Muggle job with O.W.L.s as credentials and see how far you get…) In the magic workd, things like banking appear to be kind of reserved for folk of a goblinish type, and, uh, what else…? Not much, as such. So your employment options are resricted to (apparently) working for the Ministry of Magic, really (and just how many new graduates can that august institution absorb…?) The point is that Rowling appears to be making an issue of the fact that her erstwhile child heroes are now “working” adults… and she simply has not set up the world to provide them, or a remotely adeqate number of those like them, with productive employment options even in the magic world they inhabit let alone the Muggle one. Which then begs the question – WHY are the wizards and witches interacting with the Muggle world AT ALL – they can get nothing useful out of it and they have to spend their entire existence hiding who and what they are. Which then skates very close to Rowling’s vision of Mundania, in that last sectionof the last Potter book. And it badly did not work. Because without the magic to prop it up… the decorations had nothing to sit on. And it all fell down.
2. And while we are on Hogwarts. It’s a great deal of fun, even if it is Boarding School on Oxford University Steroids – that dining hall! the high table! and when it comes to food please let me assure you – as a British Boarding School graduate myself, that the food doesn’t looke anytthing like the extravaganza shown by the Potter movies. In fact my own years at boarding school have left me with an instnict to eat very fast (because if I wanted enough food I would have to gobble it) and a lasting aversion to any food that has a remotely PINK tinge (because nothing natural is pink, and any pink food tastes accordingly…) ) But leaving all that aside (and I was LOVING the moving portraits and all the ghosts and half the world was tearing around screaming I WANT TO BE IN GRYFFINDOR!!!) it prepares its students for – well – I don’t know. It might be of great use to know how to brew up a juice with which to change your appearance, and it works wonders for a story with magic-run plots, but practical? Not hardly. And while in some senses there might have been a raison d’etre for the whole thing while Voldemort was looming out there… what now, when the enemy has been vanquished? What is the reason for sending your magical children to Hogwarts, at all, other than to just Have Fun Out There (and education be damned). And speaking of Voldemort…
3. – well, surely we can say his name now, he’s DEAD – he was kind of sort of the point of the whole saga, his existence, his powers, his vanquishment. Now he is gone. A story protagonist is only as good as his antagonist and let’s face it VOldemort was a doozy – but what now? There might have been a point to learning Defense against the Dark Arts when there was a Dark Lord out there, but why now? Just who would you Avada Kedavra? It diminishes the deadly spells to fling them at neighbours who happen to annoy you by not cutting their grass. But how many Dark Lords to you get to have coming up right after the previous one has been vanquished – do they sort of line up offstage and wait for their number to come up – “Okay, Voldermort is up – next – I believe it’s number 34 – where the hell are you when you’re needed center stage? Come on come on come on we don’t have all day… all right, number 35, then? Who’s next?” And without that overaching Good Versus Evil storyline Potterworld devolves – yes, yet again – into Mundania. And Rowling is less good at Mundania than she is at Magicworld.
But she doesn’t have enough to keep Magicworld going.
Not this Magicworld, anyway.
So fair enough, she said she was sort of done with Harry Potter anyway. But if she wanted to write more books she was now at a crossroads. She could write another book for kids (or not). She could write another fantasy (or not). Whatever she picked, she faced the spectre of Harry Potter casting a gigantic shadow over it all. If she DID go for another fantasy for children, can you just see the reviews? “Well, it’s no Harry Potter…” (as thougn anything could be.. you only get one phenomenon a lifetime…) If she picked one of the two – a book for children that was NOT fantasy, or a fantasy that was NOT a book for children – she would be up against the same Sisyphus slope. Either the fantasy-for-adults would be inevitably called ‘childish” – (“does she think she is still writing for twelve year olds?”) or the non-fantasy for the children would be panned for not being as inventive and dazzling as Harry Potter was. Can’t win.
So she took the last path, wrote a new book which was NOT a fantasy and NOT for children.
And, alas, even though plenty of reviews are okay, there are any number of them that invoke Harry Potter within the first paragraph or three of it. And I’ve seen a disconcerting number of reflections on how her writing style just didn’t quite make the jump with her. The writing style that was fine for the middle-grade Harry Potter books with which she made her name and her fortune just didn’t play as well when the intended audience was all growed up, as it were.
But this strikes me as a sort of an awful situation to be in. Write something phenomenally successful and are you EVER going to be let off that hook? Are you doomed to have to repeat yourself over and over again until even you are sick of the taste of your fiction, because the reading public can’t accept anyhting else from you? Do you take the risls inherent in writing something utterly different? How do you cope if you fail? Is huge overwhelming success as a ficiton writer OF A PARTICULAR FICTION going to hang above you like a shadow of doom ever more?
And what if you DO make the leap, and try something that’s far from your original success, and readers start finding out that your writing style can’t make the leap with you….?
Do you stay true to type? Or do you simply close your eyes and jump and hope that ENOUGH readers will follow…?
Alma Alexander is a Pacific Northwest novelist whose new YA trilogy, "Worldweavers", debuted with "Gift of the Unmage" in March 2007 ("Spellspam" follows in 2008, and "Cybermage" in 2009). Her other books include the internationally acclaimed "The Secrets of Jin Shei". Visit site.
- Alma Alexander
- Diana Pharaoh Francis
- featured posts
- For Novelists
- Hard SF
- learning to write
- Mindy Klasky
- Not Remotely Writing Related
- our authors
- our books
- publicity and promotion
- publishing trends
- the business of writing
- women in SF
- writing humor
- writing life
- writing process
Browse our archives: